基于湖南三刊的区域中医药期刊学术地位、功能重塑与优化策略*

作者：许 盈1，禹纯顺1，王诗棋1，徐 琦2

单位：1.湖南中医药大学，湖南 长沙 410208；2.湖南省中医药研究院，湖南 长沙 410013

引用：引用：许盈，禹纯顺，王诗棋，徐琦.基于湖南三刊的区域中医药期刊学术地位、功能重塑与优化策略[J].中医药导报,2025,31(11):155-162,189.

DOI：10.13862/j.cn43-1446/r.2025.11.027

PDF： 下载PDF

摘要：目的：分析湖南中医药期刊的学术地位现状及其形成机制，探讨功能重塑的演化特征，构建系统性优化策略。方法：以《湖南中医药大学学报》《中医药导报》《湖南中医杂志》为研究对象，基于2015—2024年的文献计量数据，运用CiteSpace可视化工具，从载文量、影响因子、被引频次、核心作者分布及关键词聚类等维度构建评价体系进行分析。结果：三刊学术地位差异化明显。《湖南中医药大学学报》篇均被引12.21次，高被引论文占比3.3%，展现学科引领力；《中医药导报》总被引73 079次，体现传播广度优势；《湖南中医杂志》发文量降幅60%，专注临床应用价值。功能重塑呈现三维特征。知识生产从同质化转向“基础与前沿”“传统与现代”“临床与基层”的专业化分工；平台角色从“发表平台”转变为“创新平台”；服务功能拓展为连接多元主体的知识枢纽。三刊在区域创新生态中分别扮演知识生产者、传播者与应用促进者角色。结论：资源禀赋、战略选择和功能定位是学术地位差异化的关键因素，期刊功能正经历从单一传播向多元服务的深度重塑，建议通过强化差异化定位、推进协同创新、构建“期刊+”生态等策略，推动区域中医药科技期刊高质量发展。

关键词：中医药科技期刊；学术地位；功能重塑；优化策略；差异化发展；知识枢纽；文献计量分析

Abstract：

Objective: To analyze the academic status and formation mechanisms of regional traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) journals, explore the evolutionary characteristics of functional reshaping, and construct systematic optimization strategy. Methods: Taking Journal of Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Guiding Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Pharmacy, and Hunan Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine as research objects, based on bibliometric data from 2015 to 2024, CiteSpace visualization tool was used to construct an evaluation system for analysis from dimensions such as publication volume, impact factor, citation frequency, core author distribution, and keyword clustering. Results: There were significant differences in the academic status of the three journals. Journal of Hunan University of Chinese Medicine had an average citation per paper of 12.21 and a high-cited paper ratio of 3.3%, demonstrating disciplinary leadership. Guiding Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Pharmacy had a total citation of 73,079, reflecting the advantage in communication breadth. Hunan Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine had a 60% decrease in publication volume and focused on clinical application value. Functional reshaping presented three-dimensional characteristics: Knowledge production shifted from homogenization to professional division of labor covering "basic and cutting-edge research", "traditional and modern integration", and "clinical and grassroots application". The platform role transformed from a "publication platform" to an "innovation platform". The service function expanded into a knowledge hub connecting multiple subjects. The three journals played the roles of knowledge producer, disseminator, and application promoter respectively in the regional innovation ecosystem. Conclusion: Resource endowment, strategic choices, and functional positioning are the key factors leading to differences in academic status. Journal functions are undergoing in-depth remodeling from single communication to diversified services. It is suggested to promote the high-quality development of regional TCM scientific journals through strategies such as strengthening differentiated positioning, advancing collaborative innovation, and constructing a "journal +" ecosystem.

Key words：traditional Chinese medicine scientific journals; academic status; functional reshaping; optimization strategies; differentiated development; knowledge hub; bibliometric analysis

发布时间：2025-11-30

点击量：104