“相火理论”与“命门学说”研究文献的可视化对比分析*

作者：吕 强，唐志安，丁 晶，孙苗苗，郑云子，王乾佑

单位：宜兴市人民医院，江苏 宜兴 214221

引用：引用：吕强，唐志安，丁晶，孙苗苗，郑云子，王乾佑.“相火理论”与“命门学说”研究文献的可视化对比分析[J].中医药导报,2026,32(1):178-184.

DOI：10.13862/j.cn43-1446/r.2026.01.030

PDF： 下载PDF

摘要：目的：运用文献计量工具对比分析“相火理论”与“命门学说”的研究历史和前沿热点，以期相互借鉴。方法：检索中国知网（CNKI）、万方数据知识服务平台（Wanfang Data）、维普中文期刊服务平台（CSTJ）、中国生物医学文献服务系统（SinoMed）从2010年1月1日至2024年12月31日收录的“相火理论”与“命门学说”相关文献。将文献导入NoteExpress 4.0.0.9855软件按纳入和排除标准筛选后，命名“相火理论”文献为相火组，“命门学说”文献为命门组，使用CiteSpace 6.3.R1软件对作者合作关系、研究机构合作关系，关键词共现、关键词聚类及聚类时间线进行可视化知识图谱绘制，并对关键词进行突现分析。结果：最终纳入“相火理论”文献1 009篇，“命门学说”文献752篇，两组文献交集（相关文献）97篇。对比分析显示两组发文均呈现波动上升趋势，相火组发文增速较命门组快；相火组发文最多的作者是郝建梅，命门组则是林明欣；北京中医药大学、山东中医药大学、广州中医药大学是两者发文量较多的共同机构；相火组高频关键词为朱丹溪、君火、名家经验等，命门组则是名医经验、孙一奎、相火等；两组聚类分析各生成10个标签，结合两组的突现分析发现，两者的理论完善研究是当前的研究热点。结论：临床经验探讨和理论体系完善重建是两者的热点与方向，不同的是相火组在理论完善方向偏于不同理论的融合发挥，命门组则偏于自身理论的细化及探索；相火组在理论应用趋势方面偏于证治探讨，命门组则偏于养生指导；相火组在疾病门类研究上偏于肝胆病，命门组则偏于脑系病。两理论在临床试验与基础研究方面仍有较大空间，未来可从多组学研究、系统生物学入手，并可从中药方剂角度进行高质量的随机对照试验，充实两理论的高级别应用证据。

关键词：相火；命门；可视化分析；CiteSpace；中医各家学说

Abstract：

Objective: To comparatively analyze the research history, frontier hotspots of "Xianghuo Theory" and "Mingmen Theory" by using bibliometric tools, so as to provide mutual reference for their further study. Methods: Relevant literatures on the "Xianghuo Theory" and "Mingmen Theory" published from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2024 were retrieved from the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform (Wanfang Data), Chinese Scientific and Technical Journals Database (CSTJ) and Chinese Biomedical Literature Service System (SinoMed). After importing the literature into NoteExpress 4.0.0.9855 software and screening according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the "Xianghuo Theory" literature was named as the Xianghuo group, and the "Mingmen Theory" literature was named as the Mingmen group. CiteSpace 6.3.R1 software was used to visualize the knowledge graph of author collaboration, research institution collaboration, keyword co-occurrence, key word clustering, and clustering timeline, and to perform keyword emergence analysis. Results: A total of 1,009 literatures on "Xianghuo Theory" and 752 literatures on "Mingmen Theory" were finally included, with 97 overlapping literatures (relevant literatures) between the two groups. Comparative analysis showed that the number of publications in both groups presented a fluctuating upward trend, and the growth rate of publications in the Xianghuo group was faster than that in the Mingmen group. HAO Jianmei was the most productive author in the Xianghuo group, while LIN Mingxin ranked first in the Mingmen group. Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Shandong University of Chinese Medicine and Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine were the common institutions with a relatively large number of publications in both fields. The high-frequency keywords in the Xianghuo group included ZHU Danxi, Jun Huo and famous doctors' experience, while those in the Mingmen group were famous doctors' experience, SUN Yikui, Xianghuo, etc. Ten clustering labels were generated respectively from the cluster analysis of the two groups. Combined with the burst detection analysis of the two groups, it was found that the improvement of the two theories was the current research hotspot. Conclusion: The discussion of clinical experience and the improvement and reconstruction of theoretical system are the hotspots and directions of both theories. The difference lies in that the Xianghuo group tends to focus on the integration and application of different theories in the direction of theoretical improvement, while the Minmeng group focuses on the refinement and exploration of its own theory. In the trend of theoretical application, the Xianghuo group leans towards the discussion of syndrome differentiation and treatment, while the Minmeng group tends to health preservation guidance. In the research of disease categories, the Xianghuo group focuses on liver and gallbladder diseases, while the Minmeng group focuses on encephalopathy. Both theories still have great potential in clinical trials and basic research. In the future, research can be carried out from the perspectives of multi-omics and systems biology, and high-quality randomized controlled trials can be conducted from the perspective of traditional Chinese medicine prescriptions, so as to enrich the high-level application evidence of the two theories.

Key words：Xianghuo; Mingmen; visual analysis; CiteSpace; various theories of traditional Chinese medicine

发布时间：2026-01-30

点击量：175